|
India Olympic program in shambles
Thu, September 25 2008
Until the other day, the media didn’t think it worth its while to talk to boxers or wrestlers. The Beijing bronze medals have changed all that. Now Vijender Singh and Sushil Kumar are much sought after by camerapersons and reporters. Even those who didn’t win a medal, Akhil Kumar for one, are receiving flattering attention. Don’t be surprised if one fine evening you find Vijender, endowed as he is with good looks, endorsing some product or the other, provided it doesn’t breach any service rules of the Haryana police in which he is now a deputy superintendent. If he does, let’s hope he has the wisdom to choose the right kind of thing to endorse, something compatible with the image of his macho sport. It would be churlish to begrudge medal-winners individual accolades, promotions and awards in cash and kind. But, when Bindra – India’s first ever Olympics gold medal winner – urged everyone to get involved in a national endeavour to encourage Olympic sports disciplines, he had something else in mind. He was looking far beyond individual awards. A television channel has revealed the sorry state of facilities provided to the 300 plus boxers at the senior national championships at Bathinda. This, barely three weeks after India won its first ever Olympic medal at Beijing. The living conditions at Bathinda were little better than in slums. All because there were no sponsors, as India’s national coach G.S. Sandhu said before the cameras, a view also endorsed by the boxing federation secretary Col. Murlidharan Raja. If the Indian team at last month’s Olympics could get the required international competitive exposure before Beijing it was only because of funds provided by the sports ministry. At the same time, promoting boxing and other Olympic sports at the grassroots level is as important as funding the specialized training of a few chosen ones. Where will the chosen ones come from if sport is not encouraged at the grassroots level, in the states and districts? Suddenly, Bhiwani is in the news because of the boxers it has produced, including Vijender and Beijing quarter-finalists Akhil Kumar and Jitender Kumar. But even Bhiwani cannot boast of a decent enough modern boxing ring. What is true of Bhiwani is also the case with other places. In fact, boxers, hardy people that they are, are known to come from unlikely places with no rings worth the name at all. There is little protection even from rain in the Bhiwani ring. If Bhiwani has become a boxing hub it is because the tough Haryanvi can take it on the chin and give it back in good measure. But there are equally tough races elsewhere in the country – the men and women of the north-east, for example. It is from there that boxers like Zoram Thanga and Dingko Singh have emerged, not to mention the world 48 kg women’s champion Mary Kom. It is in the ring that these people from humble homes find a means of self-expression with their fists. Importantly, the road to jobs also starts in the ring. This is the time for corporates to do their duty by the talented sons of poor drivers and bus conductors and peasants and slum dwellers, not only through sponsorships but also by creating infrastructure. It is a shame that events like national championships are so shabbily held for lack of sponsors at a time when the country is expecting its sportspersons to fetch a more respectable number of Olympic medals after the breakthrough at Beijing. (The writer is a veteran sports journalist in India). By K. Datta
Tell us what you think
Reader comments are edited for clarity and may be selected to appear in the print version of the Asian Pacific Post.
|